Is anyone actually surprised by this?

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    as opposed to OpenAI which also stores keystrokes and then sells them to anyone who’d pay?

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When I read DeepSeek’s privacy policy, I was creeped out by the invasiveness of the keystrokes thing. Then I realised that ChatGPT is just as creepy, but less upfront about it, and DeepSeek’s relative transparencyn caused me to see them in a more favourable light

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t need to… Muricans took care of destroying democracy all on their own

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We are now at a time where US blocks China services in order to protect their companies

    Just like many US services are banned in China in Order to protect their companies

    So, I hope no surprise…

    ———

    Its or their for countries?

    Edit: I have chosen their

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      but it’s a foreign actor so OOooooOOWwwwooOOOO sCaRrRey!

      I love that people think this is a solid own. Lest we forget Hong Kong, or an impending hot war in Taiwan or building out extradition systems with an expanding network of countries to forcibly repatriate and torture dissidents and human rights lawyers.

      You used to not have to explain why authoritarianism was bad.

      Edit: I would love to know the Pro side of what happened in Hong Kong, or the forced extradition regime, since evidently I’m clearly in the wrong in thinking those were bad. What am I missing?

      • Foni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It used to not be necessary because democracies used to have moral authority but since the revelations of Manning and Snowden non-Americans see no difference between giving our data to the USA or to China or any other. We also know from the reaction to the war in Ukraine and Gaza that human rights claims are only sometimes used.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This “China’s AI is taking your data and that’s bad” is shockingly similar to “TikTok is taking your data and that’s bad”. Lots of US counterparts do the same thing, but I don’t see (as much) media coverage about that.

    Don Draper: “no no no, everyone else’s cigarettes are dangerous. Lucky Strikes are… toasted.”

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The way I think of it is, I don’t live in China, so regardless of my objections to their values or human rights abuses, why would CCP or an affiliated company care about me or ruin my life on the basis of or by abusing my data? A big part of why I care about privacy is I don’t want to be filtering my every thought through consideration of whether the powers that be would approve, and US companies are way more relevant to that.