• RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why should we care? So address space may run out eventually - that’s our ISPs’ problem.

    Other than that I actually don’t like every device to have a globally unique address - makes tracking even easier than fingerprinting.

    That’s also why my VPN provider recommends to disable IPv6 since they don’t support it.

    • MrRazamataz@lemmy.razbot.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because people in countries with ISPs that are unable to provide IPv4 (e.g. too expensive) can’t access GitHub easily.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m actually bit sad that I had to move onto a ISP which has zero IPv6 support, as I previously did have IPv6. The last thing I did on that connection was to debug the hell out of my IPv6 code I had developed.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That should simply not be allowed. Cgnat for ipv4 is fine if they also provide proper ipv6

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not. I disable it on all Linux machines I manage. And we do not use it at work either.