Pro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoRustprogramming.devimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1918arrow-down145
arrow-up1873arrow-down1imageRustprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareCroquette@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 day agoI interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agoYeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people. Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.
I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people.
Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.