• Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also cybersecurity implications here. Nefarious actors can prop up their evildoings with fake stars and pose as legitimate projects.

    • aliser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      my first thought. I usually rely on stars for “trustworthiness” of random projects before running their code.

  • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would it be? Software is good based on it’s use and recommendations from real folk, not *s. Many project not on github

    • 💭 ᴍɪɴʏᴀᴇɴ@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’d argue that the project can be good and not widely used. Do you think that there are projects with real use case and are great open source software and not widely used because its buried under the *s?

      It could be a relatively inexpensive way for niche marketing. Especially if the developer has a payment option with the software. Probably a decent way to get the software out in the open for profitability, no?