fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoWho the fuck needs an x axis anywaymander.xyzimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1475arrow-down18
arrow-up1467arrow-down1imageWho the fuck needs an x axis anywaymander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·edit-22 days agoThere is an 𝑥 axis and it’s not too hard to comprehend, although I’d prefer the dividing character to be newline rather than “|”, or only show the surveillance year. Also, the “trendline” is sus, an actual trendline cannot always be above data.
minus-squarethejml@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI honestly don’t know why they even list the birth year. It explicitly states “8 Year Olds”, we can do the math.
minus-squareTriumph@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoThe years are either out of order or overlapping.
minus-squareryedaft@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days agoNo, it’s “surveillance year | birth year” and only every other value is listed. It would be nicer with a numerical value but it’s fine.
minus-squareonslaught545@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoBut they aren’t from what I can see. They’re surveillance/birth year pairs in ascending order.
There is an 𝑥 axis and it’s not too hard to comprehend, although I’d prefer the dividing character to be newline rather than “|”, or only show the surveillance year.
Also, the “trendline” is sus, an actual trendline cannot always be above data.
I honestly don’t know why they even list the birth year. It explicitly states “8 Year Olds”, we can do the math.
The years are either out of order or overlapping.
No, it’s “surveillance year | birth year” and only every other value is listed. It would be nicer with a numerical value but it’s fine.
Well, that’s certainly intuitive.
But they aren’t from what I can see. They’re surveillance/birth year pairs in ascending order.