• Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    He does not know what his investments are in and has no access to them, they are in a blind trust.

    • Boing@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      A blind trust isn’t BLIND. He can still see them in fact he has already bought military equipment for our army from one of his investments… He Knows what he has and where it is. LOL

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        lol… yet it is. You fiscal Conservatives don’t know shit.

        Definition of a Blind Trust A blind trust is a legal arrangement where the trustor (the person who creates the trust) transfers control of their assets to a trustee (the person managing the trust) without retaining knowledge of how those assets are managed. This setup is designed to prevent conflicts of interest, particularly for individuals in sensitive positions, such as politicians or corporate executives.

        How a Blind Trust Works Key Roles Trustor: The individual who establishes the trust and places assets into it. Trustee: An independent party who manages the trust assets without input from the trustor. Beneficiary: The person or entity that benefits from the trust, often the trustor themselves. Asset Management Once the trust is established, the trustee has full discretion over the assets. The trustor does not know what investments are held or how they are managed. This separation helps ensure that the trustor’s decisions in their professional role remain unbiased.

        • Boing@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know exactly what it is and how it works. Go watch the Committee meetings that have been going on about Carney’s Conflict of Interests all ~104 of them. Remember during the election when he was asked about his conflicts and he said “What possible conflicts?” LOL https://youtube.com/shorts/P8uH7_gef4A

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            No, you don’t know how it works.

            “The trustor does not know what investments are held or how they are managed. This separation helps ensure that the trustor’s decisions in their professional role remain unbiased.”

            They don’t know how they are managed so they can’t influence them.

            And that YT video is nothing but Carney saying he is following the rules. How does that prove anything? Don’t be a Conservative stooge and use your brain.

            • Boing@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yes, yes I do and I have been following the committee meetings about his COI and his screen What about the purchase of 26 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems? A “Carney conflict” refers to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s potential conflicts of interest related to his past financial holdings with the investment firm Brookfield, which includes investments in defense companies like Lockheed Martin. This was brought into focus with the Canadian government’s recent plans to purchase missile launcher systems from the U.S… You were saying something…

              • Oderus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                No, you still don’t because having stock in Brookfield is something many people do, like Pierre Polievre. You’re making something from nothing and it’s funny because it just shows how little you know. If Pierre was Prime Minister, you wouldn’t care about him owning several houses and profiting by making policy that benefits him. You Conservatives are just bigly mad because the Liberals have someone well versed in finance and your leader is a career politician that has no policy and always resorts to name calling. Big please, keep telling us what a fiscal master you are.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            oh well if the moose on the lose says it… i mean, that is hard evidence right there! hahahahaha

            • Boing@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Prove him wrong. He has a challenge on his data for anyone to prove any of his sources and links to be wrong So go ahead

            • Boing@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Scared of the truth? Contact him if you don’t believe him he is willing to be proven wrong on any piece of his data. Bitch The funny thing is the chart was just a small chart to start now it’s Charlies mess on the wall