BlueMAGA

  • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The problem here is structural. For president especially a 3rd party candidate is nothing more than a spoiler. It’s less so if they can win for the house or senate. I would whole heartedly agree with you if the Us had a parliamentary or ranked choice. But we don’t and until we do; with the demo crates it’s a slightly more likely, then just vote for the least fascist that has a chance to win. Use your 3rd party vote in the primaries.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The US Empire will never pass ranked choice voting in a manner that allows for systemic change. The point of the political system is to perpetuate the economic system, and fixing the problems with society requires advancing to socialism and leaving capitalism behind.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      a 3rd party candidate is nothing more than a spoiler.

      And there we go with the excuses.
      In non-banana republics with a normal political landscape and populations with spines there have been parties and candidates scoring 1-2 percent, then 10, then 60. Or the other way.
      That’s how elections work, and nobody of those initial 1-2% voters gave up.
      Since outside the US, nobody propagates that defeatist BS.

      But OC, this election is “the most important election in history and in our lifetime” so now is not the time to rdo such crazy things as not vote for a duopoly you supposedly don’t like but have since the beginning of your miserable country.

      You have only yourself to blame and deserve zero sympathy.
      On the contrary.
      You’re like an arsonist that constantly burns houses and now cries because he managed to set his own home on fire.
      Well burn baby burn.