• MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You know, when i originally read this, the way i interpreted it was that he was saying that if you need to earn money to live you don’t deserve to live.

    I much prefer the version that is an indictment of the phrase “earn a living” as implying you don’t deserve to live if you aren’t “working” in the modern sense of earning money at a modern job vs doing what’s necessary to stay alive like all nature’s critters.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can I be the Genx here and just … yeah, we’ve always had to work for survival. Like each and every organism that find a niche. They are all working… even photosynthesis is a kind of activity.

    Good grief.

    All critters have to work. Think about it.

    • DanVctr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Maybe… Just maybe… We’ve evolved past being critters and could use our superior brain power to avoid having to work like the animals…

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thank you. I have been saying this for years (more than a decade now).

    Feminism fought for the independence of women from abusive husbands/partners, by making them earn their own money, so they can be free. I would not say that the majority of the population feels particularly free today, because the economic situation strangles them. There is a new dependency created in stead of the old one: The dependency from the employer. Especially with at-will employment, a manager or higher-up can fire you at any moment, which can cause homelessness and despair. These are not good things that we want to have.

    The logical consequence of fighting for freedom and equality is to fight for economic equality: People should be able to eat and sleep in peace, without having to worry about their circumstances tomorrow. “Equality” does not mean that everybody has the same amount, but that everybody has the chances they need to succeed in life.

    We need a universal basic income, or any equivalent of it such as handouts in various forms.

    • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Or, hear me out, we create a socialist government that make food, water and housing human rights and that works towards a communist world where everyone gets what they need and give what they can.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Socialism has worked incredibly well in uplifting the lives of the working classes. In countries like Russia and China, life expectancies doubled. The incredible improvements in living conditions, democratization, and orienting society towards satisfying the needs of the many instead of profits for the few resulted in the greatest eradications of poverty in history. Socialism has worked, continues to work, and will increasingly work as time goes on, until it is eventually replaced by communism.

          Fascists and capitalists, slavers and landlords and other leaches were indeed killed and oppressed by the communists. It’s better than the daily genocide and violence of capitalism and imperialism.

        • Bael422@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Lolol, lets compare that to capitalism numbers. Don’t forget to compare suffering too, since everyone seems to overlook quality of life, injuries, and slavery, in favor of just one sliver of the many metrics of deaths. So, don’t forget to calculate the indirect deaths caused by capitalism too lol

  • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    ITT: guys who probably consider themselves too smart for religion thinking in terms dictated by the church.

    “Deserving” and "undeserving* are made up concepts disconnected from any concrete reality, just shards of Christianity preserved in the amber of American civic religion and exported throughout the capitalist-dominated world. If you talk about who “deserves” this or that, you might as well be talking about who’s holy and who’s a sinner. The truth is, we are just animals who banded together tens of thousands of years ago to help each other survive. Many anthropologists say that society began when we started taking care of those who could no longer contribute as much physically: the old, the sick, the injured. But hey, if you want to be less socially evolved than a bunch of cave-dwelling hunter gatherers, that’s your choice. Just don’t expect the rest of humanity to entertain your rotten ideas about useless eaters, and don’t act surprised when you find yourself put out on the ice.

  • Kynn@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Well since it’s literaly us vs the planet (since we seem to be unable to regulate our society’s consumption of finite resources), the question is : does the planet exist for us to consume it ?

    The answer is no, but we’ll still consume it.

    Do we deserve to live ? Well outside of society, there is no reason we’re deserving it more than any living being. And sometimes I clearly wonder, when some individuals contribution is a big negative legacy for the next ones, and to the planet.

    Tbh I do not mean we (humans) do not deserve to live, but I clearly wouldn’t want it taken for granted, cause it is not.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That varies quite a bit by country. Capitalist systems have no problems with destroying the world, but socialist countries are better able to plan production and distribution. You can see this in action in the PRC right now, and its major shift towards renewables and electrification at an astounding scale.

  • Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Our society (with US at the forefront) is built on contradictions. On one hand, capitalism says you don’t deserve anything, you have to earn it. On the other hand, consumerism says you deserve every new gadget, luxury, treat.

    I believe both are false: everyone deserves a reasonable standard of living (UBI?), nobody inherently deserves more than that but it should be possible to earn it. And we should acknowledge that earning something is not a matter of moral superiority, but a combination of some effort and some luck.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Capitalism is sold by liberalism as a grand system where everyone is on equal footing as buyers and sellers of goods and services, including labor. Consumerism is pushed by capitalists to increase the purchase of commodities beyond what would naturally happen (no need for a new phone every year), a sign of capitalism’s inefficiencies.

      Earning more through labor isn’t wrong, but the problem is that the system is built off of the theft of value created by workers, and parasitic capitalists sitting at the top siphoning off vast amounts of material wealth. Every sale of a commodity continues this vast siphon from the working classes to the capitalist class. UBI doesn’t fix this, what would fix it is moving onto socialism, where public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy, the working classes are in control, and production and distribution are aimed at satisfying needs, rather than private profits.

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Okay congrats, you have now been wiped out by a society that prioritizes collective well-being and is therefore able to field a larger, healthier army with more advanced technology.

  • staciagrey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You don’t, deserve it. Life is a privilege, everyday you wake up, is one more day to be grateful for.

    • RogerMeMore@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      That’s true, but sometimes it feels like life is just a series of obstacles we have to overcome. It’s not always easy to be grateful for every day. But I guess that’s what makes life worth living!

      • staciagrey@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        43 seconds ago

        You know the human experience wasn’t meant to be like this. I understand where this message was going. I have a slanted view because I lost all the good ones, in my life. You do you, be happy doing it.

  • VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Deserving to live and surviving are not the same. In the natural condition if you don’t gather or hunt, you have no food. You die. You do not deserve anything.

    Even in society you are not entitled to others working for you. However, in a civilised society we should provide for those incapable to provide for themself due to ethics.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s basically the core difference between the 2 political parties in the US currently. One essentially believes humans have a right to be alive, and the other does not. All the other policy differences kind of stem from that.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They don’t actually disagree, though. Both operate under the direct control of the wealthiest in the country, the capitalist class, and work to ensure imperialism persists and that their private owners continue making immense amounts of money.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I dont belong on this planet. That’s why I have to rent space until I mercifully pass away. Giving birth is child abuse and the most selfish act possible.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I semi agree with you, but the focus on “giving birth” vs “impregnation” seems misogynistic as fuck, especially with how much easier (cost, recovery time, risk of complications) vasectomies are than hysterectomies or even tying fallopian tubes.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Giving birth is child abuse and the most selfish act possible.

      Hard disagree. 🤷‍♂️ Surely depends on who you are and your means of providing for the child, both materialistically and emotionally. That’s just my opinion.

      • pipi1234@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        In some countries you are a disease away of financial bankruptcy. Good luck being able to 100% guarantee a living.

        Furthermore, this is the first generation that is worse off than the previous one, and its a trend that seems will continue.

        In the lucky event of being part of the select 3% that has financial security, no luxury can shield you from the pain the rest of the people is suffering.

        Maybe I’m a pessimist, but introducing a child into this roulette is not the kindest if you think about it.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          In some countries you are a disease away of financial bankruptcy. Good luck being able to 100% guarantee a living.

          Yup, but far from everywhere.

          Furthermore, this is the first generation that is worse off than the previous one

          Strong doubt 🤨 Which generation are we talking about? Lots of wars and plagues and stuff in history have made a generation of people worse off than their parents. That obviously didn’t stop us from procreating.

          Maybe I’m a pessimist, but introducing a child into this roulette is not the kindest if you think about it.

          Definitely are, or maybe more accurately a perspectivist, if that’s a thing. There are lots of countries and societies where bringing children up is not a “roulette” or “child abuse”. Everyone I know has good means and nothing but love for their children, in spite of (sometimes harsh) difficulties.

          And we are more emotionally aware of ourselves and our children in this generation than ever before. For the first time, a generation of parents are raising themselves and their children simultaneously. It’s very emotionally and mentally taxing but it’s a very good step in the right direction. We are listening to our kids and understanding their needs.

          Have a good day, try not to generalize a (personal?) bad situation. ❤️

          • pipi1234@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            While I agree with most of what you said, I cannot disregard how a swift change in politics can be introduced to satisfy the wims of the billonaires. We have recent and astounding examples (USA). Sadly I don’t trust humanity anymore. I don’t have a choice but to try to live my life the best I can, but I won’t force anyone else into existence.

            Have a good one you too my friend!

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              54 minutes ago

              I on the other hand also agree with you now, that a swift change in politics can definitely upend an entire nation and affect several generations to come.

              But when we have children, we go into it with a lot of risk. The child might be born with disorders, develop crippling phobias, be bullied, get cancer. We never know what might happen. I might get run over by a car on my way to work tomorrow. But I can’t live my life thinking “what if” all the time. We have to keep going and have to keep fighting for a better life. Or work to maintain a good life we might already have.

              Or at least that’s a drive that a lot of humans have. It’s in the nature of the majority of people I would guess. Otherwise we wouldn’t be here, because our ancestors would’ve already cut the chain. Life is fuckin’ hard, quite frankly. And if that drive wouldn’t be there, it wouldn’t be worth it. 😅 Sharing it with people you love is what makes it worthwhile IMO.

              Thanks for a good talk 😊