• QuestionMark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’m sorry, I truly do not intend to be impolite and I didn’t downvote you, but I think people can ask AI for a summary if they want to themselves.

      Sorry again. I just really don’t like AI, and my expectation of a social media website is for it to be about human interactions. We can talk with AI anytime we want, what we’re lacking is pure human communication.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        Agree, but such a brick of the posted text also don’t make easy a good conversation, in this case a summary can be helpfull knowing what is about.

        • hoppolito@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          But that ‘brick’ of the posted text is just the article that is linked. So if we are commenting under a post dedicated to the article it would stand to reason that we read the article itself, would you not agree?

        • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          a summary can be helpfull

          No. LLMs can’t reliably summarize without inserting made-up things, which your now-deleted comment (which can still be read in the modlog here) is a great example of. I’m not going to waste my time reading the whole thing to see how much is right or wrong but it literally fabricated a nonexistent URL 😂

          Please don’t ever post an LLM summary again.