• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yup. Birds are reptiles! If you want to define a monophyletic clade that includes crocodiles and lizards, there is no way to do that without also including birds. To define a clade, you take the evolutionary tree and make a “cut” somewhere on it. Everything below that cut is part of the same clade, you can’t selectively remove some branches but not others, unless it’s by changing where you make your single cut.

    So in this diagram:

    Clade diagram of all tetrapods, including amphibians, mammals, and groups of reptiles including tuatara, lizards, snakes, turtles, crocodilians, and birds. The diagram has a green circle around the reptiles other than birds, labelled "reptiles". "A" is labelled at the last common ancestor (LCA) of all mammals. B at the LCA of all amniotes (mammals & reptiles), and C at the LCA of all reptiles, including birds.

    The green circle notwithstanding, you would usually define reptile as a cut at the “C” on the diagram. You could put the cut at Lepidosauria, but that would mean crocodiles and turtles are no longer considered reptiles either.

    A more zoomed-in look would show that after crocodiles and birds branched apart, you also get another branch where pterosaurs branch away from dinosaurs, and that birds are one of many branches and subbranches of dinosaur.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I really appreciate the info and the way you laid it out. Just curious, is that knowledge part of a hobby and/or career? Or was that like just one of the random tidbits you picked up somewhere?