I remember Harper’s government pushing through legislation without review, shutting down government when they didn’t get their way, and burning documents for three days as they left office. They cared about not appearing fraudulent, but I wouldn’t trust them as far as the length of Parliament Hill.
Hey now, remember that it wasn’t “Harper’s Government” but in fact, “The Harper Government”? That fuck had so much ego he officially changed the name of the federal government to his name. It’s not proof of anything, of course, but does that recontextualize the cloud of suspicion on behalf of others for you?
For many Canadians that last part would be enough to throw suspicion on the veracity of the ‘documents’.
Does it? I don’t remember Harper’s government to have been commonly fraudulent. Now Poilievre on the other hand I could see.
I remember Harper’s government pushing through legislation without review, shutting down government when they didn’t get their way, and burning documents for three days as they left office. They cared about not appearing fraudulent, but I wouldn’t trust them as far as the length of Parliament Hill.
Hey now, remember that it wasn’t “Harper’s Government” but in fact, “The Harper Government”? That fuck had so much ego he officially changed the name of the federal government to his name. It’s not proof of anything, of course, but does that recontextualize the cloud of suspicion on behalf of others for you?
That’s right! Man, he was worse than Doug Ford at using public funds for advertising.