• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like every electronics manufacturer is skimping on thermal paste for some reason. Doesn’t make much sense, you’re just knee-capping the performance of your expensive products for the sake of fractions of a penny.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      the performance in the short term doesnt change much. its long term that does, and theyd rather you upgrade your gpu rather than use your current one indefinitely.

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      They definitely are cheaping out. I bought a Powercolor Hellhound 7900 XTX last month, and it was running 60°c while totally idle. I got a Thermal Grizzly Kryosheet for it and when I opened the card, there was already significant thermal pump-out in the paste with completely bare spots on the die. That card was brand new with less than 8 hours use when I opened it. After installing the Kryosheet, all temps dropped 20°c.

      It’s total horseshit that even top end GPUs made by “reputable” manufacturers are shipping with cheap shitty paste.

      • kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Honestly must have been a manufacturing error. Which is no excuse, QC should have caught it.

        You’d think that high prices would mean the ability to have higher quality manufacturing without affecting the margin much. But I think much of that money is going to TSMC, Nvidia and AMD, with third-party manufacturers getting squeezed as well. But idk.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They don’t care because people buy it anyway. The article even says this is better but they just didn’t apply it correctly at the factory. It also says it allows them a simpler cheaper cooling solution which is definitely more money than pennies in research and manufacturing

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Do they? How do they know that? If customers are experiencing performance below what they expected from x processor, wouldn’t they be inclined to return the product? Or at least not buy it again? And if not, couldn’t they have just used a cheaper processor and then sold it for the same price?

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Video cards have been basically scalper only for the last 2 generations where have you been? People are paying $3-4k for rtx5090 they don’t give a shit if the thermal paste is bad they will just buy it because it’s the one available for purchase as retailers have no stock age Nvidia is not making more because they’d rather use their manufacturing allocation at tsmc for their highly profitable Ai chips.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago
            1. They are in stock everywhere
            2. Nvidia is not the only one selling cards. There are a dozen brands to choose from. If you needed one, wouldn’t you pay even more money for a functional one vs. one knee-capped because the OEM saved $0.005 on cheap thermal paste?
            3. These brands sell other products besides GPUs and it hurts their brand
            4. We weren’t talking exclusively about GPUs.