I’ll just make my own cpu with a breadboard and a few wires!

Do, or do not, there is no try.

After about 30 years of Linux, here’s my take on your questionnaire. Not sure if it’ll add on what many others have said.

The one thing you have to remember is that Linux is not a replacement for Windows. It’s a completely different operating system that lets you do the same operations in a different way. It can however run some of the same software thanks to a number of very clever hacks. That being said…

Will my ability to play games be significantly affected compared to Windows?

Significantly, no. Some things won’t run, especially games that require deep anti-cheat hooks in the system. An awful lot of stuff will run fine thanks to the incredible work done by Valve.

Can I mod games as freely and as easily as I do on Windows?

Short answer: no. It often relies on software tools that won’t run as easily. Sometimes, yes.

If a program has no Linux version, is it unusable, or are there workarounds?

Sometimes there’s a functional equivalent in the Linux world, or you can get the Windows version to run either in a virtual machine or in a pseudo-emulated environment (Wine or bottles).

Can Linux run programs that rely on frameworks like .NET or other Windows-specific libraries?

Yes. they can be written specifically for Linux. Or they can be written for Windows and will work in Linux, sometimes (it’s hard to get the translation layer right).

How do OS updates work in Linux? Is there a “Linux Update” program like what Windows has?

Every distribution manages this. It works by itself and is typically much cleaner than in Windows.

How does digital security work on Linux? Is it more vulnerable due to being open source? Is there integrated antivirus software, or will I have to source that myself?

The structure of the software in Linux (and the fact that it mostly comes from one source (the distribution) makes for a smaller target than in Windows where it comes from all over the place. Antivirus aren’t used.

Are GPU drivers reliable on Linux?

They’re the same as in Windows (the codebase is the same, the OS “glue” is specific). Other than the occasional bad release, they’re usually OK. Linux is currently transitioning to a new display system, from X11 to Wayland, and nVidia is a bit behind on Wayland adoption. However, all three GPU makers typically work fine whether you use X11 or Wayland.

Can Linux (in the case of a misconfiguration or serious failure) potentially damage hardware?

Even voluntarily, that wouldn’t be easy to do.

And also, what distro might be best for me?

Honestly, it doesn’t really matter. They all install the same thing in the end. Just pick something mainstream and well documented and not something obscure.

Note that for X or Y reason, a given distribution may disagree with your hardware. It’s the problem when everything is very specifically designed for Microsoft’s OS, around specs that aren’t fully publicly disclosed. If that happens, just try another.

It’s horrible, you have to type “<package manager> install nvidia” and not make any typos at all or it won’t work. The horror, I still get flashbacks.

Hm, maybe I ought to look at it again then. Thanks for the tip.

Oh. Cool. Carry on then.

It’s only good for phone photos though. If you also take pictres with a camera, it doesn’t have any clear way to handle those.

Honestly, I’d rather they disclose problems and fix them than just ignore them like so many others do. It’s the responsible thing to do.
Software is complicated and mistakes happen regularly.

One of the first slackware (so many floppies) on my mighty 486 DX 50. Linux wasn’t at 1.0 yet at the time.

Linux (many versions) has been my daily driver ever since, with windows as a gaming backup a lot of the time. I still have it on a single machine in a small partition because of VR :‐/

In my experience KDE on OpenSuse and probably Fedora are rock solid. The first and nowadays probably also the second (which has moved to first tier instead of being a sub-distribution) are considered reference implementations of industry strength distros.

My thought would be that you’ve added something slightly broken to the mix which breaks KDE. It can happen. Linux is complicated, KDE is also complicated, what annoys one desktop can be ok with another. If you want to figure out what the problem is, you’ll have to go through your various system logs to see what fails.

You probably have to return the 4gb extra then.

Maybe it has an Sd slot or something?

You use the left foot on the clutch only. The other one alternates between the two pedals. I’m likely older than you are and have driven manual vehicles all my life.

Well done on your comment.

That’s for an extremely specific use case though.

Yeah, no. Still a terrible idea.

Systemd won’t be done until they port libre office to it dammit!

That’s why we invented the ISS. Little known fact.

I never really used its find function. Whenever I searched for something, my first idea would always be to open a shell.

It’s a bit silly since kde spends so much energy indexing stuff though. I really should give it another try.

It certainly worked and was full featured, but the interface wasn’t very good. Having to edit the network interfaces to configure them wasn’t good UI for example (the partition editor works the same way). It also took until my second install (that was quite some time ago) to figure out that I could pick what software I wanted to install.

Anyway, a lot of things could be made clearer for first time users.

Kids these days…