• 0 Posts
  • 2 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 18th, 2025

help-circle
  • I think there’s actually not 2 bars per year, but instead:

    • the first red bar = the year 2000
    • the second bar (which is not paired with another bar, and also, is not labelled at all) = the year 2002
    • the third bar = the year 2004
    • the fourth bar = the year 2006
    • and so on until the final bar, the twelfth one, = the year 2022

    The x axis increases by 2 years each entry.

    The number after the “|” is only meant to “helpfully” (and confusingly) tell you when those children were born. To take your example:

    • the data for the year 2000 is represented by the first red bar (7 per 1000 eight year olds had autism in 2000) and is labelled as 2000 | 1992 because those kids were born in 1992.
    • the data for the year 2008 is represented by the fifth red bar (11 per 1000 eight year olds had autism in 2008) and is labelled as 2008 | 2000 because those kids were born in 2000.

  • When they collected the data in 2000, about seven 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 1992.

    When they collected the data in 2002, about six 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 1994. This information was not labelled on the x axis.

    When they collected the data in 2004, about eight 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 1996.

    When they collected the data in 2006, about nine 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 1998. This information was not labelled on the x axis.

    When they collected the data in 2008, about eleven 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 2000.

    … I’m too lazy to continue but …

    When they collected the data in 2020, about twenty seven 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 2012.

    When they collected the data in 2022, about thirty two 8 year olds out of 1000 had autism. Those children were born in 2014. This information was not labelled on the x axis.

    I’m not positive i’m reading it right, but that’s what I think they were trying to convey with this (terribly labeled) graph.

    eta: yeah, rereading the subtitle, those numbers and years make sense