This is just plain false.
There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.
the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html
Yeah its about quantum systems interacting, not sentient beings watching.
still pretty mystical though in my book!
does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?
the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to
You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop
That is not infinity, its undefined.
This only works if you use a one sided limit.
you can but then it’s not “British spelling”
it’s spelled ‘forty’ in british english too
omniseasonal is still seasonal ;D
the description fits my uneducated stereotype of the automotive industry.
Swede here. I’ve only heard about things like this in american movies.
This number goes for any substance
There are 20 billion calories in a gram of diet coke too
This is the solution to E=mc^2
If we are talking dietary calories uranium is close to 0
This is not accurate, only 93% has died so far!
hurr durr maybe it’s a vector in ℝ
What they actually see:
convolution
cross product
dot product
multiplication
“You’re doing it wrong ya doofus”
US law is an interesting response to an ethics question
The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!
as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.
That number is just the E in E=mc²
If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.
One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons