Blaming capitalism alone ignores that many socialist economies were already in long-term stagnation before the 1990s. Shock therapy often caused real harm, but it didn’t destroy thriving economies — it was applied to systems that were already failing.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 11 days ago
Cake day: January 3rd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
The legality is in their head.
President has a D in his party, so it’s socially legal I guess
LordFireCrotch@lemmy.todayto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Can't partner with that eViL AuThOrITarIan china after all!
3943·4 days agoWhy is there so much Chinese propaganda on lemmy?
The line going up just means GDP per capita increased, not that the system was healthy. USA’s GDP continues to go up, would you consider our current economy healthy? Post 60s, Soviet growth slowed and was mostly driven by oil, not productivity. That hides a lot of inefficiency and fragility that GDP doesn’t show. When oil prices dropped and reforms started, the economy collapsed because it had very little resilience left, not because capitalism suddenly “killed” a thriving system.
To be clear - I’m not saying that shock therapy didn’t cause harm, I’m just saying that the USSR was clearly not booming by the time it was applied.