

Afaik the maintainer(s) have provided a reasonable explanation and cleared up the reproducible builds part


Afaik the maintainer(s) have provided a reasonable explanation and cleared up the reproducible builds part


Just use the appropriate command for the hash type, i.e. sha256sum <filename> (iirc, might be wrong, man is your friend)


Depends on both what the adblocker responds and how a given program handles failures.
Pi-Hole and similar adblockers can pretend that the domain is on the device itself (A 127.0.0.1), is an invalid IP (A 0.0.0.0) or that the domain doesn’t exist at all (NXDOMAIN). Each one has its own implications, with the latter (usually the default afaik) being the most likely to have software generate a hard error and give up.
“The pickled children” sounds like a metal band name
If the firmware is vulnerable, it’s only a matter of time before it gets breached again.
If you already want to experiment with pfSense/OPNSense, you could place it between your router and the ISP’s and just inspect the traffic. You don’t even need to pass traffic through it, you just need a single interface in promiscuous mode connected to the same network segment (switch)
Instant? My guy where do you draw the line?
Spaghetti sauce is just tomatoes and spices. It gets ready by the time the spaghetti are cooked


I’m gonna be so mad if I die before seeing a supernova.
No I’m not using Kali for “hacking” I’m experimenting if I can play games on it
Sorry but… why on earth would you do that? Kali is a specialized distro, it’s not made for day to day desktop use, much less for gaming on it. If you want to game on Linux, pick either a generic or gaming-oriented distro, and use Kali in a VM or dualboot.
Validating what they believe? We don’t give a fuck, we just want them to stop what they’re doing. We asked nicely for years. Still are.
Can you explain how folding into their suppression of political opposition (both violent and not) helps fight against digital IDs and censorship?


He’s a professional geek


I’ve heard this argument before, and it makes no sense. You evaluate new core components internally as part of developing your distro, not in releases because “they’re not LTS”


Mostly the circlejerk about how memory safety magically fixes all security holes for me


Me opening man test for the 19th time


I think the problem is NFS more than Gnome - even umount chokes on an unresponsive share
haha little spinny balls go brrr


I’ve also seen GUI used (e.g. by QMK)
Also if you have a fast internet connection, check out https://netboot.xyz/