

Nope.
Hate to keep litigating this around here, but the shift alone is enough. Explaining to people WTF an immutable filesystem is, is a sure way to frustrate them into giving up, despite whatever comms finesse you might THINK you have.
Counterpoint: STOP SUGGESTING IMMUTABLE DISTROS TO NEW USERS
For people who just want a functional OS, they don’t want to have to think about new rules. They need a quick off-ramp from Windows that acts as they expect.
Package management is already enough of a mindfuck for people switching, then you’re throwing in containers, permissions, flatpak vs native packages, what sandboxing is, why your browser likely can’t just upload a simple fucking file, and why your camera doesn’t work on Zoom, because you have a meeting in 10 minutes.
Unless you are handing people something akin to a mobile OS with everything all inclusive and configured so EVERYTHING works off the bat, you’re doing such a huge disservice to people switching over to an immutable distro, and there is ZERO benefit, but all kinds of added frustration.
You need to stop, and I yield my time.
Your hardware is really the defining factor at the lower levels, but then whether you have encrypted partitions is the barrier at the OS level.
Understanding where your problem lies needs to be known, so more symptoms or logs would be helpful.