Steve Dice

you belonged to a marginalised group

Oh, shit. I left out hugely important context. This happened in Mexico so it’s probably neither of those.

Twice I got my face plastered on the flyers of a conference because none of the other speakers looked Mexican enough. I still don’t know if I should have been offended.

Neither is a self-driving car, you started with the unhinged comparisons, I just went along with it to show you how ridiculous you’re being. Also most drugs are legal.

Sure. And alcohol, cigarettes and drugs should be banned. Unprotected sex, too. And bungee jumping, water slides, rollercoasters…

Snap off of it, will you.

It was given permission to use rm and it rm’d an entire drive and you want to give it permissions to access hardware sectors.

Did the car come with full self-driving mode disabled by default and a warning saying “Fully self-driving mode can kill you” when you try to enable it? I don’t think you understand that the user went out of their way to enable this functionality.

From anti-gravity documentation:

When you first configure Antigravity, or via the settings menu, you must select a Terminal Command Auto Execution policy. This setting dictates the agent’s autonomy regarding shell commands.

So…

Did you give it permission to do it?

Yes. Yes, they did.

It’s a human who made the decision to give such permissions to an AI agent and it resulted in a drive being wiped. That’s the context.

It didn’t make any decision.

You need to take care of that chip on your shoulder.

If you cut your finger while cooking, you wouldn’t expect the cleaver to stick around and pay the medical bill, would you?

Sometimes I conjure up the delusion that having a big feline is doable if raised from birth because my little feline is such an adorable baby that she shows her belly to literally everyone she sees even when she’s never met them. But even this cute ball of fluff will dig her claws into my leg to avoid falling when she rolls over while napping on my lap. Imagine if those claws were 4 cm.

What if I don’t wanna get shipped to El Salvador for throwing up gang signs?

Yep. Just read it again. You’re absolutely correct.

What? No, the image explicitly says f is a meme.

Let M and f be as in the hypotheses of the meme.

Since f is a meme, then f∈M. That means f can be applied to itself. It follows that (f, f(f))∈f. We have then:

f ∈ {f, {f, f(f)}} = (f, f(f)) ∈ f

Thus, f∈f, violating the Axiom of Regularity. We conclude the meme is mathematical bullshit and I will not have it.

What’s upchuck?

No.

Bitter and resentful too.

They do exist. They usually look like this, though:

So probably nobody on Lemmy.