• rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Should he lose, his political career would be over.

    That’s a full-chub, full-mast outcome if I ever heard of one.

    • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      LOL He lost because we had a candidate that actually gives a shit about our riding, and is not human trash.

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is another potential problem for Poilievre. Critchley is right. Parachute candidates always face a potential backlash when they drop into ridings because they have lost their own seats. That’s because there is something fundamentally opportunistic and unfair about replacing a successful local candidate with an unsuccessful national one. Does Poilievre care about the riding or, as Critchley believes, is he just using it as the safest way to become an MP before Parliament is recalled?

    This is a great point I’m surprised hasn’t been talked about more. Pierre is running on a party-over-country campaign.

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also even if he does succeed, he’ll probably never outlive the “Parachute Pierre” nickname for the rest of his career.

    • bowreality@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      He won’t show up for the local debate either I heard. I would very much vote for somebody local if I were in that riding. Especially when he bumps somebody who got elected and then doesn’t care enough to show up.

    • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This local article and interview with the candidate who defeated Poilievre includes a photo of Poilievre’s former constituency office in his Carleton riding.

      One has to wonder about the lack of signage on the actual office and apparent challenges in accessibility.

      Le Droit article

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      The riding he’s running in would elect an aardvark if it was labeled “conservative”. Who’s on the ballot or what they stand for have little impact. The question is if it will be with 80 percent, or “just” 70.

      Edit: I need to revise this since it’s going to be write-ins. It holds true if writing “conservative” will count, but actually writing Pierre Poilievre would sorely test most voters.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Military vet” with a picture of a horse, I thought it was a veterinarian at first 🤷