What they should withdraw is the Notwithstanding Clause itself. It’s a nasty thing.
Honestly, it’s telling that the province’s that want this argument removed are the ones most likely to abuse the notwithstanding clause to infringe on charter rights. Why else should they oppose it?
Conservative premiers be like….
How else are they supposed to demolish already made bike lanes?
Holy crap I tried to guess which 5 provinces it was, and I got 5/5. I was wondering between Eby and Houston for the last one but I got it right, Houston ain’t a good guy.
Progressive conservatives are slimy too.
I agree, but…legally speaking*, I think they have a decent case?
*I’m not a lawyer, just your standard online idiot
Also standard issue online idiot with no law background. Only here to judge, not to be useful or productive. :)
The notwithstanding clause used to be the nuclear option, I wish it still was.
