“This action follows the automakers’ unacceptable decision to scale back their manufacturing presences in Canada, directly breaching their commitments to the country and Canadian workers,” the government said in a late-night media release.

  • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Canada should do the same with Chinese vehicles - at least, as it’s possibly a better idea to not let them in.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. Quotas at a small tariff level would mean that they would charge a fair price, and quota goes up as their investment in Canada goes up.

      • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        These cheap Chinese cars are made with slave-like labour and other coercive measures, no tariffs can ever change that. When made by slave-labour, there is no such thing as a fair price.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          China’s competitive advantage in autos is entirely based on abundance (cheap) of materials and automation advantage, as well as local government support. There is zero slave labour in the process. By “fair price”, I meant comparable to our existing options due to quotas and small tariff. This would help fund their investments in Canada.

          • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            im a little suspicious of there being zero slave labor with china EV’s. I’m not saying its impossible, just based on their track record i’d like to see proof that its truly slave labor free.

            • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Since there’s a lot of propaganda around slave/no-slave labour from different sides, I’d offer another angle which is easier to verify. Check what percentage of a typical vehicle cost comes from labour. Then from that, check the manufacturing wages in different locations and scale the labour cost by that. That’s will give you the ballpark labour cost advantage between. Then compare that with equivalent vehicle prices. You could do the same exercise for Mexico-produced vehicles too.

              Also you should check how the labour conditions are in Mexico. A lot of our vehicles are built there and a lot of the components of our Canadian-built vehicles are made in Mexico. And then nearly all the transistors, resistors and other electronic components in those components are made in China. You might also find that Mexican wages in the industry are significantly lower than those in China.

              None of this is to say that we should not care about working conditions. Rather that absolute ethical judgements are practically impossible thanks to our neoliberal free-trade system that created these problems without our consent. We aren’t given the choice between a Canadian-made Ford Mach-e at $60K and a Mexican-made one for 50K. It’s all Mexican-made for $60K. We aren’t given the choice of a $60K, Canadian-made, slave-free-certified Lincoln Nautilus and a $50K, Chinese-made one. It’s all $60K Changan-Ford made Nautilus. No one asks the workers what they want to build in Ingersoll, or Oshawa, or Oakville. So we’re forced to choose between different turds with different seeds in them. Some turds are deadlier than others depending on the year we live in.

              PS: One more thing, relevant to the price-wages relationship. Prices aren’t set according to costs. Prices are set to the maximum level where the output times the price produces the highest profit. Whether the cost is 1% or 80% of the revenue. The wages are set to the lowest level possible allowed by the labour market conditions (not the product market), on labour power (union organization) and government regulation (minimum wage, mandatory benefits, union-friendly laws, etc). I used to fall for the narrative that there’s a positive relationship between prices and wages within a firm but that’s just not true. It’s not true theoretically or practically. There’s only a relationship in that wages set a bottom of the price below which the firm would go bankrupt. And that’s no different than any other cost like materials and machines. Above that level, the limit is whatever they can get away with. That’s neatly demonstrated by the lack of difference in price between vehicles made in Mexico, US and Canada even though wages are significantly different between the three.

              • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                i agree 100% and im not ignoring the other companies that do it, they are to blame just as much as others. EVERY company producing cars at every step should be paying their workers a fair wage and fair working environments. My point was that the cost of china EVs were really low, whats the calculus that brings their prices so low with accounting for their workers, and should we just be allowing more of the same (or worse idk) or do we do a made in Canada approach? I am of the mind that canada shouldn’t have a big manufacturing base for more simple parts, be we can do more complex work like a automotive factory or engine factory or however its laid out, and import the base materials from our EU partners.

                • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah I get you completely. I used to think it’s labour cost but these days I’m of the mindset that it’s margin stacking and profit maximization on our manufacturers’ end. See this:

                  PS: One more thing, relevant to the price-wages relationship. Prices aren’t set according to costs. Prices are set to the maximum level where the output times the price produces the highest profit. Whether the cost is 1% or 80% of the revenue. The wages are set to the lowest level possible allowed by the labour market conditions (not the product market), on labour power (union organization) and government regulation (minimum wage, mandatory benefits, union-friendly laws, etc). I used to fall for the narrative that there’s a positive relationship between prices and wages within a firm but that’s just not true. It’s not true theoretically or practically. There’s only a relationship in that wages set a bottom of the price below which the firm would go bankrupt. And that’s no different than any other cost like materials and machines. Above that level, the limit is whatever they can get away with. That’s neatly demonstrated by the lack of difference in price between vehicles made in Mexico, US and Canada even though wages are significantly different between the three.

                  I recently looked at the F-150 price over the last 30 years. It’s grown over 5% per year. That’s way above inflation and wages move more or less with inflation. That’s tells me Ford is just increasing the price as they can whenever they can. Now do the same thing for all their sources - Bosch, Denso, Magna, SK (for EVs) etc. If everyone is doing that those margins stack and make Ford’s cost higher. There’s often little competition between suppliers.

                  Now if you take someone like BYD who makes most of those components in-house they don’t charge themselves margins on their batteries, motors, etc. So their costs are lower. We know that BYD along with the rest of the EV makers in China are in a brutally competitive market. So they can’t charge high prices, leaving the prices close to their costs. Of course they still source components from other firms. They don’t make electronics. But what if those other firms also can’t/don’t profit-maximize due to competition or regulation? When I add that together I think it makes for a better explanation to the price difference given that the differences between labour costs in Mexico, Canada and US produce zero difference in vehicle prices. At least that’s where I am on this one lately. I used to think it’s all down to labour cost before I started digging a bit in wages in different places and how firms set prices. That’s why I encourage people to look into those things.

                  do we do a made in Canada approach

                  We absolutely do. That should be the long term goal since factories don’t show up overnight. If the US autos are going back to their own country and scaling back EV production plans, we should get whoever wants to build EVs here. Unifor can handle labour conditions and wages on our end. Taxed direct imports could be useful as a stop-gap under certain conditions since NA autos aren’t getting any cheaper, but I won’t be mad if we say, no-imports, build factories here from the get go.

                  E: Sorry for the walls of text. I’m trying to explain what’s in my head and it always comes out longer than expected. 😅

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Booo I want my full flood of China cars. You Wana be the "domestic manufacturers "? Well good, keep your domestic overpiced inefficient shitboxes at home.

      • Scotty@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, just that you can see how the flood of ChEaP cHiAnA cArS are made, a recent example from Brazil:

        [In Brazil], in the same month that Chinese BYD’s car carrier arrived in the country, Brazilian prosecutors announced plans to sue BYD and two of its contractors for ‘slave like conditions’ at a factory site. A task force led by Brazilian prosecutors said it rescued 163 Chinese nationals working in “slavery-like” conditions at a construction site […] where Chinese electric vehicle company BYD is building a factory.

        The [Brazilian] Labor Prosecutor’s Office released videos of the dorms where the [Chinese] construction workers were staying, which showed beds with no mattresses and rooms without any places for the workers to store their personal belongings.

        Officials said [BYD contractor] Jinjiang […] had confiscated the workers’ passports and held 60% of their wages. Those who quit would be forced to pay the company for their airfare from China, and for their return ticket, the statement said.

        Prosecutors said the sanitary situation at BYD’s site in Camaçari was especially critical, with only one toilet for every 31 workers, forcing them to wake up at 4 a.m. to line up and get ready to leave for work at 5:30 a.m.

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          see this is what i don’t like. and it goes to show where those “cost savings” are coming from for the cars

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Does it really matter how long the fucking thing lasts when you’re signing a lease for 2-3 years anyways? No probably not. But what does matter is if the lease payment is gonna be $200 bi weekly and not $350-400